2012 2:00:00 PM

Monday, June 11, 2012 2:00 PM
745 4th Street, Sparks, NV 89431

General Business: 6.5

Title: PCN11029 – Consideration of and possible action on a request for final approval of Crestgate Pyramid final planned development handbook

Petitioner/Presenter: Sycamore Gardens/Karen Melby

Recommendation: The Community Services Department recommends approval of PCN11029; see suggested motion below.

Financial Impact: N/A

Business Impact (Per NRS 237):
A Business Impact Statement is not required because this is not a rule.

Agenda Item Brief: A request for final approval of the development design standards handbook for Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development

Background: On December 8, 1997, the City Council approved a Master Amendment, zone change to Planned Development (PD) which tentatively adopted the Planned Development Design Standards Handbook and a tentative subdivision map for 11 parcels. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, A and B are built on or under construction. The planned development, called Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development, included a 150-unit independent living facility for senior citizens, 100-unit assisted care living facility, 7 office parcels and 2 restaurants with low-volume retail/office uses on the 2nd floor. On December 9, 2002, the Sparks City Council approved the final handbook for Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development that included 250 senior housing units, seven office parcels and 2 low volume commercial pads. Amendments to the Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development Standards Handbook were approved by the City Council to allow the options on Parcels D and E (now Parcels 3 and 4) of either senior apartments or a maximum of 8 office buildings in 2004. The Planning Commission approved a master plan amendment on February 2, 2012 from OP (Office Professional) to GC (General Commercial) which the City Council certified on February 27, 2012. On April 4, 2012, the City Council tentatively approved amendments to the planned development to allow personal and RV storage. This agenda item asks the Planning Commission to consider final approval of the amendments.

Analysis: Sparks Municipal Code 20.18 regulates the review process for Planned Developments. Sparks Municipal Code 20.18.080 specify the review process for the final approval of a planned development as follows: ASection 20.18.080 Procedure for final approval A. Application for final review by the Sparks Planning Commission and ultimate final approval by the Sparks City Council must be made to the Administrator within the time specified by the minutes granting tentative approval. B. A public hearing on an application for final approval of the plan, or any part thereof, is not required if the plan, or any part thereof, submitted for final approval is in substantial compliance with the plan which has been given tentative approval. The plan submitted for final approval is in substantial compliance with the plan previously given tentative approval if any modification by the landowner of the plan as tentatively approved does not: 1. Vary the proposed gross residential density or intensity of the use; 2. Vary the proposed ratio of residential to nonresidential use; 3. Involve a reduction of the area set aside for common open space or the substantial relocation of such area; 4. Substantially increase the floor area proposed for nonresidential use; or 5. Substantially increase the total ground areas covered by buildings or involve a substantial change in the height of buildings. A public hearing need not be held to consider modifications in the location and design of streets or facilities for water and for disposal of storm water and sanitary sewage. C. All requirements and regulations pertaining to the application for final approval, substantial compliance with tentatively approved plan, alternative proceedings for final action on plans not in substantial compliance, recourse to courts for failure of city to grant or deny final approval, certification and filing of approved plan upon abandonment or failure to carry out approved plan shall be provided in NRS 278A.530 to 278A.580, inclusive. Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 278A.540 states what constitutes substantial compliance with a tentative approved planned development application. ANRS 278A.540 What constitutes substantial compliance with plan tentatively approved. The plan submitted for final approval is in substantial compliance with the plan previously given tentative approval if any modification by the landowner of the plan as tentatively approved does not: A. Vary the proposed gross residential density or intensity of use; B. Vary the proposed ratio of residential to nonresidential use; C. Involve a reduction of the area set aside for common open space or the substantial relocation of such area; D. Substantially increase the floor area proposed for nonresidential use; or E. Substantially increase the total ground areas covered by buildings or involve a substantial change in the height of buildings. A public hearing need not be held to consider modifications in the locations and design of streets or facilities for water and disposal of storm water and sanitary sewer. Staff has reviewed the final draft of the Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development Handbook. All of the corrections, as approved by City Council on April 9, 2012, have been incorporated into the final draft handbook. Based on the standards listed in NRS, staff is of the opinion that the final approval draft of the Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development is in substantial compliance with the tentatively approved plan as approved by the City Council. The final draft handbook: • does not vary the proposed gross residential density or intensity of the Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development Standards Handbook; • does not vary the proposed ratio of residential to nonresidential use; • does not reduce the common open space area; • there is no increase to the floor area proposed for the nonresidential use from the approved tentative handbook; • there is no increase in the total ground areas covered by buildings nor is there substantial change in the height of buildings. There are no changes proposed in the final Handbook. It is staff’s opinion that the final draft amendment for the Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development Standards Handbook is in substantial compliance with the approved tentative Handbook.

Alternatives: If the City Council is not of the same opinion as staff, then NRS 278A.550 lays out the proceedings if the plan is determined not to be in substantial compliance with the tentatively approved plan. NRS 278A Plan not in substantial compliance, Alternative procedures; public hearing final action. 1. If the plan, as submitted for final approval, is not in compliance with the plans as given tentative approval, the city or county shall, within 30 days of the date of filing of the application for final approval, notify the landowner in writing, setting forth the particular ways in which the plan is not in substantial compliance. 2. The landowner may: (a) Treat such notice as a denial of final approval; (b) Refile his plan in a form which is in substantial compliance with the plans as tentatively approved; or (c) File a written request with the city or county that it hold a public hearing on his application for final approval. If the landowner elects the alternatives set out in paragraph (b) or (c) above, he may refile his plan or file a request for a public hearing, as the case may be, on or before the last day of the time within which he was authorized by the minutes granting tentative approval to file for final approval, or 30 days from the date he receives such notice of such refusal, whichever is later. 3. Any such public hearing shall be held within 30 days after the request for the hearing is made by the landowner, and notice thereof shall be given and hearings shall be conducted in the manner prescribed in NRS 278A.480. 4. Within 20 days after the conclusion of the hearing, the city or county shall, by minute action, either grant final approval to the plan or deny final approval to the plan. The grant or denial of the final approval of the plan shall, in cases arising under this section, contain the matters required with respect to an application for tentative approval by NRS 278A,500.@

Recommended Motion: I move to approve PCN11029 as the final draft is in substantial compliance with the City Council action on the Tentative Approval of the Amendment to Crestgate Pyramid Planned Development and the facts supporting these findings as set forth in the staff report.

Previous Item

Next Item

Return To Meeting