Sparks City Council Meeting 3/25/2019 2:00:00 PM
Monday, March 25, 2019 2:00 PMCouncil Chambers, Legislative Bldg, 745 4th Street, Sparks, NV
General Business: 9.4
A Business Impact Statement is not required because this is not a rule.
On September 10, 2018 City Council adopted a new method of classification and compensation using vendor, Korn Ferry Hay Group (HAY). As part of the adoption, an appeal process was created to give employees adversely impacted by the new program opportunity to have their positions reconsidered. This item presents the changes proposed to address the second round of appeals and includes position appeals where the new range maximum is between 5-15% lower than the previous pay range maximum in the resolutions. Twelve appeals were sent to Hay for relevelling. Analysis of these positions necessitated adding five other positions for a total of seventeen, with sixteen being in the mid-management resolution and one in the executive resolution. Nine positions changed levels while the remaining eight stayed the same. These results are incorporated in the Appendix A in the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution for Council’s approval with a recommended effective date of March 25, 2019.
Background:
As presented to Council on September 10, 2018, a natural step in the implementation of a classification and compensation system is to re-evaluate the classification (leveling) for positions where the compensation (new pay range) differs significantly from the existing pay range. The City prioritized the order of leveling re-review by greatest adverse impact. The first leveling re-review occurred in the fall of 2018 and results were approved by City Council on November 26, 2018.
The second group HAY reviewed consisted of seventeen positions and those with a level change are before Council today for approval. Of these, twelve were in the original group sent to HAY. Eleven are mid-management positions and one is a department head position (presented today in a different agenda item). Five additional positions from mid-management were included in the review because they were in job families or jobs in similar levels. The effective date of these changes will coincide with Council approval of the Appendix A changes.
Analysis:
During the HAY re-review process, departments evaluated materials originally sent to HAY, updated the job description where applicable and updated the organizational chart. The updated information was used as a foundation for the re-review and re-leveling by HAY. In some instances, the nature of the work has changed since the original review. In other cases, the job description did not have material changes.
The same HAY consultant who completed the first outlier review was commissioned to analyze the second outlier review and is independent of the original team. When a position is reviewed by HAY, there are three possible outcomes. The classification level may be adjusted up, it may stay the same or it may go down. In this second round, eight mid-management positions stayed the same and eight went up. No positions went down.
Employees who now have more room from their current pay to the top of the new pay range as a result of this review will not see an immediate pay change. They will be eligible for an increase at their individual merit review date.
Before you today are the classification and compensation changes for the positions in the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution, Appendix A that is a result from the HAY review process described above. The changes are as follows:
Job Classification Levels and Pay Ranges to be changed in the Appendix A:
Title: |
Pay Range: Minimum Maximum |
Level: |
|
Contracts and Risk Manager |
$ 68,932 |
$ 103,398 |
15 to 16 |
Development Services Manager |
$ 85,696 |
$ 128,544 |
17 to 18 |
Human Resources Analyst Senior |
$ 68,932 |
$ 103,398 |
15 to 16 |
Human Resources Manager |
$ 95,971 |
$ 143,936 |
18 to 19 |
Planner II |
$ 62,691 |
$ 94,037 |
14 to 15 |
Planning Manager |
$ 85,696 |
$ 128,544 |
17 to 18 |
Transportation Manager |
$ 85,696 |
$ 128,544 |
17 to 18 |
Utility Manager |
$ 85,696 |
$ 128,544 |
17 to 18 |
The fiscal impact of the level changes are estimated to cost the General Fund is $2,692 in FY19, $5,744 in FY20 and $9,076 in FY21. The estimated cost to other funds is $3,290 in FY19, $5,720 in FY20 and $4,139 in FY21.
Alternatives:
Recommended Motion:
I move to approve the amendment to the attached Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution, Appendix A effective March 25, 2019 as by presented by staff.
Attached Files:
MP - Appendix A 2019.03.25.pdf
Hay costing - Outlier Mar 2019- MP.pdf