Sparks City Council Meeting 11/26/2018 2:00:00 PM
Monday, November 26, 2018 2:00 PMCouncil Chambers, Legislative Bldg, 745 4th St., Sparks, NV
General Business: 9.9
A Business Impact Statement is not required because this is not a rule.
On September 10, 2019 City Council adopted a new method of classification and compensation using a vendor, Korn Ferry Hay Group (HAY). A component of the implementation plan was to re-evaluate the classification (leveling) for positions where the compensation (new pay range) differs significantly from the existing pay range. Those positions were submitted for re-review. Based upon the results from HAY, changes to the pay ranges and additional titles in the Appendix A in the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution are recommended effective October 1, 2018. The estimated cost to the General Fund is $5,984 in FY19, $11,563 in FY20 and $16,411 in FY21. The estimated cost to other funds is $319 in FY21.
Background:
On September 10, 2018, City Council adopted a systematic process of determining pay using the HAY classification and compensation method for all positions in the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution.
As presented to Council on September 10, 2018, a natural step in the implementation of a classification and compensation system is to re-evaluate the classification (leveling) for positions where the compensation (new pay range) differs significantly from the existing pay range. The City prioritized the positions most negatively impacted as first to have their leveling re-reviewed. Of 188 positions evaluated at the City, 16 were identified as outliers for immediate review because the new pay range was 15% or below the existing pay range.
These 16 positions spanned multiple resolutions and contracts. The review of all 16 is complete. However, as you will see in the tables below, a total of 24 positions had to be reviewed. This is because new titles were added and because in some cases, the job family needed to be reviewed as a unit.
Here is a breakdown of the count of positions reviewed and the reason:
Contract/Resolution | Outliers | Outlier Job Family | New Positions Never Leveled | Grand Total |
Attorney | 3 | 4 | - | 7 |
Confidential | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Executive | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Management, Professional & Technical | 9 | - | 2 | 11 |
Operating Engineers - Non Supervisory | 2 | 2 | - | 4 |
Operating Engineers - Supervisory | - | - | - | - |
Grand Total | 16 | 6 | 2 | 24 |
In the re-leveling review process, there are three possible outcomes. The classification level may be adjusted up, it may stay the same or it may go down. All three of these outcomes occurred. Represented below are the results:
Review Caused This Change to Level: | |||||
Contract/Resolution | Went Down | No Change | Went Up | Not Previously Leveled | Grand Total |
Attorney | - | - | 7 | - | 7 |
Confidential | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Executive | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Management, Professional & Technical | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
Operating Engineers - Non Sup | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 4 |
Operating Engineers - Sup | - | - | - | - | - |
Grand Total | 2 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 24 |
The effective date recommended is October 1, 2018 to make these changes consistent in timing with the adoption of the HAY method.
Analysis:
The HAY review process included upfront work with departments to review materials sent to HAY in the original review, update job descriptions and update the organizational chart. Only after that work was done was the new information reviewed and re-leveled by HAY. HAY provided a new consultant independent of the original team for the second review. In some instances, the nature of the work has changed since the original review, or the organizational chart has changed or both. In other cases, the job description and organizational chart did not have material changes.
Before you today are the classification and compensation changes for the positions in the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution, Appendix A that result from the Hay review process described above. The changes are as follows:
Job Classification Levels and Pay Ranges to be changed in the Appendix A:
Title: Assistant City Clerk Pay Range: $52,336 to $78,504 Level: 12 to 13
Title: Capital Projects Coordinator Pay Range: $57,019 to $85,529 Level: 15 to 14
Title: Civil Engineer Senior Pay Range: $68,932 to $103,398 Level: 15 to 16
Title: Recreation Supervisor Pay Range: $62,688 to $94,032 Level: 13 to 15
Title: Police Services Manager Pay Range: $68,932 to $103,398 Level: Never leveled to 16
Job Classification Titles, Levels and Pay Ranges to be added to Appendix A:
Title: Information Technology Administrator Pay Range: $68,932 to $103,398 Level: 16
Complement: In the complement, the number of System Analyst Seniors is reduced by one to account for one moving to this new title.
Title: Parks and Recreation Administrative Manager Pay Range: $62,688 to $94,032 Level: 15
Complement: In the complement, the number of Recreation Supervisors is reduced by one to account for one moving to this new title.
Alternatives:
1. The City Council may approve the Appendix A changes as presented.
2. The City Council may not approve Appendix A changes as presented.
3. The City Council may not approve Appendix A changes but provide direction or alternatives to the City Manager.
Recommended Motion:
I move to approve the amendments to the Mid Management, Professional and Technical Resolution, Appendix A effective October 1, 2018 to include changes to the level and salary ranges associated with the positions of Assistant City Clerk, Capital Projects Coordinator, Civil Engineer Senior, Recreation Supervisor, and Police Services Manager and to add the job titles and associated salary ranges of Parks and Recreation Administrative Manager and Information Technology Administrator.
Attached Files:
MP - Appendix A 2018.10.01.pdf
NRS 288 for Hay Outlier Review - MP.pdf
R-3341 MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL, AND TECHNICAL.pdf