Sparks City Council Meeting 6/22/2020 2:00:00 PM

Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/93096918084
Meeting Dial-in #: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 930 9691 8084

General Business: 9.14

Title: Consideration, discussion, and possible acceptance of an offer to settle Fichman v. Mercer, Case No. 3:19-CV-00292-MMD-CLB, for $55,000.00.
Petitioner/Presenter: Chet Adams, City Attorney/Alyson McCormick, Assistant City Attorney
Recommendation: The City Attorney recommends that City Council reject or accept the settlement offer.
Financial Impact: If City Council approves the settlement offer, the City would be obligated to pay $55,000.00 from a risk account.
Total Costs: $55,000.00
Fund: Municipal Self-Insurance    Account: 603260
Program: Police in Muni Ins Fund (050522)
Amount: $55,000.00    Budget Status: Budget Exists
Business Impact (Per NRS 237):
    
A Business Impact Statement is not required because this is not a rule.
Agenda Item Brief:

In this federal civil rights action, Plaintiff Zyhere Fichman alleges he was arrested by a Sparks Police Officer without probable cause. Plaintiff has offered to settle this case for $55,000.00. If City Council approves this settlement amount, the City would be obligated to pay $55,000.00.



Background:

In June of 2017, Sparks Police Officer Joseph Mercer arrested Plaintiff Zyhere Fichman for armed robbery and burglary. At Plaintiff's preliminary hearing in the criminal case, the Justice of the Peace found that there was probable cause to believe Plaintiff committed those crimes. However, the criminal case was later dismissed. Plaintiff then filed this civil action in United States District Court, alleging that Officer Mercer arrested him without probable cause.

Plaintiff originally sued both the City and Officer Mercer, but the claims against the City have been dismissed. Because Officer Mercer was acting in the course and scope of his employment, however, the City is obligated to pay any judgment or settlement amount on his behalf. The case is currently in the discovery phase. Plaintiff has offered to settle the case for $55,000.00. A letter from Plaintiff's attorney in support of the settlement offer is attached as Exhibit 1. 



Analysis:

If City Council accepts the $55,000.00 settlement offer, staff would negotiate the specific terms of the settlement agreement, and Plaintiff would dismiss the case with prejudice in exchange for the $55,000.00 payment.

If City Council rejects the $55,000.00 settlement offer, the case will continue. Officer Mercer could receive judgment in his favor, meaning that the City would not have any financial obligation from the case. It is also possible that Plaintiff could receive judgment in his favor in an amount that far exceeds $55,000.00, particularly because plaintiffs who are successful in civil rights actions may be awarded their attorney fees.



Alternatives:

The City Council may either reject or accept the settlement offer.



Recommended Motion:

To reject the settlement offer:

I move to reject the offer to settle the Fichman v. Mercer matter for $55,000.00.

To accept the settlement offer:

I move to accept the offer to settle the Fichman v. Mercer matter for $55,000.00, direct staff to negotiate a written settlement agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the settlement agreement on the City's behalf.



Attached Files:
     06.03.20 - Letter from Cornell.pdf
Previous Item
Next Item
Return To Meeting