Sparks City Council Meeting 6/22/2015 2:00:00 PM
Monday, June 22, 2015 2:00 PMCouncil Chambers, Legislative Bldg, 745 4th St., Sparks
Closed Door Sessions: 12.1
A Business Impact Statement is not required because this is not a rule.
Possible final resolution of an ongoing litigation.
Background:
In September 2009 a contingent of SPD officers was involved in a traffic incident following tactical training outside of Fernley, Nevada. The City was subsequently sued regarding this incident.
The U.S. District Court granted the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and sent it back to the District Court for Discovery and a possible trial. The City is now faced with retaining multiple expert witnesses as part of the process.
Pursuant to negotiations, and upon the recommendation of the City Attorney, the City Council is now being asked to approve the settlement of the litigation for $70,000.
Analysis:
The City’s cost to try this matter to a jury will far exceed the expense of settlement.
Alternatives:
The City Council could accept or deny the settlement based upon information it receives from the City Attorney during the attorney client session.
Recommended Motion:
I move to adjourn to an attorney client closed door session in order to listen to our attorney’s advice concerning a possible final settlement of this matter.